Hubert v. Joslin
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
May 12, 1932, plaintiffs traded their Chicago property to defendants for a farm with cer tain personal property thereon located in Ravenna township, Muskegon county. Plaintiffs agreed to pay $2,100 to defendants to boot. This agreement was evidenced by a land contract wherein plaintiffs became purchasers of the Ravenna property. Plaintiff Peter Hubert and defendant Crill Joslin later signed a further agreement in relation to broker’s fees and other things, which contract contained a so-called “self reliance clause.”
Prior to the execution of the instruments effecting the trade of properties,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Smith v. WerkheiserMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Craven v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
- Fleegar v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- J. B. Millet Co. v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Plate v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jim-Bob, Inc v. MehlingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Groening v. OpsataMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Mesh v. CitrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Walraven v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Colvaruso's Guardian v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.