In re Brown Co. Securities Litigation
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ALVIN B. RUBIN, District Judge:
OPINION ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA
The plaintiffs’ effort to depose employees of Bear, Stearns & Co., is opposed by the defendants and by the deponents, jointly. They seek to quash or limit the subpoena for deposition on the ground that the deponents are within the class of experts from whom discovery is narrowly limited by Rule 26(b) (4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants assert that, because “Bear, Stearns & Co.” will be called at the trial as an expert witness for the defendants, their employees are therefore within the class of experts for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Russo v. Merck & Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1957
3Cited by10 opinions
- Heffron v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Adkins v. MortonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Concerning the Application for Water Rights of the Town of Estes Park v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Grinnell Corp. v. HackettDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1976
- Marine Petroleum Company v. Champlin Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.