Legal Opinion

Curd v. Cantrell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1980No. WD 30731PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Judge.

In appellant’s claim for a real estate sale commission, the issue is whether there was evidence that the claim was disputed so that an instruction upon accord and satisfaction was properly given to the jury.

The property involved is located on U.S. Highway 71 in the western portion of Har-risonville, Missouri, and is known as the Mobile Hydraulic Building. Appellant sold *227the property for one Walker to respondents in 1968. In 1972, the building was vacant, and had been vandalized. Joe Cantrell was then working for Pappas Chevrolet in Kansas City, and asked appellant to sell his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. ParksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  2. Alaska Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HoffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Seibel v. Harry S. Surkamp Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Wyatt v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Collins v. GaskillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gibson v. HarlMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Schroeder v. Dy-Tronix, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Movie World, Inc. v. GoldmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API