Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Dy-Tronix, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1987No. 51286PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Norman Schroeder and Norman Schroeder Enterprises, Inc., brought an action against defendant, Dy-Tronix, Inc., for commissions due pursuant to a contract between the parties. Plaintiffs’ appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant in this court-tried case. We affirm.

Norman Schroeder entered into a written contract with the defendant on November 15, 1976. Defendant acts as a sales representative for various manufacturers. Its income is derived from commissions paid by the manufacturers for sales generated by it. A share of the commissions is then *935passed on to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ware v. WareMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Alaska Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HoffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Eberting v. SkinnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Stoddard v. Wilson Freight, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. McGinnis v. RolfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edgewater Health Care, Inc. v. Health Systems Management, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Randall v. HarmonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Hogan v. Armstrong World IndustriesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Promotional Consultants, Inc. v. LogsdonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Kansas City v. ColbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API