Schroeder v. Dy-Tronix, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRANDALL, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Norman Schroeder and Norman Schroeder Enterprises, Inc., brought an action against defendant, Dy-Tronix, Inc., for commissions due pursuant to a contract between the parties. Plaintiffs’ appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant in this court-tried case. We affirm.
Norman Schroeder entered into a written contract with the defendant on November 15, 1976. Defendant acts as a sales representative for various manufacturers. Its income is derived from commissions paid by the manufacturers for sales generated by it. A share of the commissions is then *935passed on to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ware v. WareMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Alaska Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HoffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Eberting v. SkinnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Stoddard v. Wilson Freight, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- McGinnis v. RolfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Edgewater Health Care, Inc. v. Health Systems Management, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Randall v. HarmonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hogan v. Armstrong World IndustriesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Promotional Consultants, Inc. v. LogsdonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Kansas City v. ColbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.