Martinez v. Cardwell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUCKER, Judge.
This was an action by appellants, Danny and Azzlee Martinez, against appellees, Harold and Dorothy Cardwell and the State of Arizona, for slander. Appellees moved for summary judgment in the trial court on the ground that the defamatory statements uttered by appellee Harold Cardwell (hereinafter referred to as “Cardwell”) were absolutely privileged. The trial court granted the motion and rendered summary judgment for appellees. From the judgment appellants have brought this appeal.
The pleadings and depositions reveal the following facts. Cardwell is the Superintendent of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Montgomery v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Hardy v. VialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Hemmens v. . NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Chamberlain v. MathisArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Petroni v. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Grande v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.