Legal Opinion

Grande v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 22, 1977No. 1 CA-CIV 3057PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Judge.

The issue in this case is whether the defense of absolute privilege is available to the defendants, officials of the Arizona State Tax Commission, in an action against them for libelous statements appearing in the Notice of Dismissal which they filed with the State Personnel Board in connection with a hearing on plaintiff’s discharge.

The plaintiff, Arthur Grande, had been employed as a tax collector for the state of Arizona for several years when he was indicted at the end of September 1971, for attempting to influence a grand jury witness. On November 1, 1971, the State…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Pearson v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. MathisArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Petroni v. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Besserman v. Town of Paradise Valley, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Hill v. Government of the CommonwealthDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API