State v. McIntosh
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Winkler, Judge.
Following a jury trial, appellant Thomas McIntosh was convicted of trafficking in marijuana, conspiracy, and two counts of possession of marijuana. He appeals, raising twelve assignments of error. Because we sustain in part his first assignment of error, we vacate the sentence in part and remand the case for resentencing in accordance with this decision.
Background Facts
On August 26, 1999, police officers investigated a break-in at appellant’s business. At the scene, officers observed marijuana residue, or “shake,” that is often found when larger quantities of marijuana are…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WellmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Freeman, 07 Je 5 (6-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Palmer v. HavilandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. Haslam, 08 Mo 3 (3-31-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.