Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Haviland

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 9, 2008No. 06-3857UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

Can a defendant commit aggravated robbery but not robbery in Ohio? In essence, this is the question that Petitioner Toby Palmer asks us to resolve. He argues that a person cannot commit aggravated robbery without also committing robbery and, therefore, he should have been punished for only one of the crimes, but not both, under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

We cannot, however, reach that substantive question. The Ohio courts have interpreted the relevant Ohio statutes as permitting punishment for both robbery and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kelly Volpe v. Ginine TrimCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Rommell Broom v. Tim ShoopCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. Render v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional FacilityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  4. Creachbaum v. Warden, London Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  5. Johnson v. Warden, Warren Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API