Legal Opinion

Donohue v. Jennings

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1983No. 13836PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.

Mary Sue Donohue (appellee) represented Jane Eloise Jennings (appellant) in a divorce action. Upon being discharged without pay, appellee filed an attorney’s lien against the proceeds of a sale of personal property ordered by the divorce court. The sale of this property was held by auctioneers who withheld the amount of the lien from appellant’s share of the sale proceeds. Appellee subsequently commenced this suit to foreclose her lien. The amount of the lien ($7,066.98) was deposited with the court by the auctioneers. Following a pre-trial conference, the trial court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pearson v. AdamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Application of VeithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Jennings v. JenningsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Moody County v. CableSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Davison v. KellarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mayrose v. FendrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hageman v. Vander VorsteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Jones v. Kartar Plaza Ltd.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Karras v. Alpha Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hageman v. Vander VorsteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API