Legal Opinion

Karras v. Alpha Corp.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1995No. 18748PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

Appellant Chris Karras appeals the trial court’s declaration that his former attorney had an enforceable attorney’s lien on certain settlement proceeds paid to Karras by Alpha Corporation. He contends that the trial court, which presided over the original litigation between Karras and Alpha Corporation, lacked jurisdiction to decide the validity of the attorney’s lien, asserting that a separate action is required. He also claims that the lien was not valid and enforceable because his former attorney withdrew as counsel of record before the settlement was finalized. We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Plaza Shoe Store, Inc. v. Hermel, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Reed Yates Farms, Inc. v. YatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Gee v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Time Out, Inc. v. KarrasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Huth v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jasper v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Johnson v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Sutera v. Sully Buttes School District 58-2South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Jasper v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API