Heinze v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Gourt, Silver Bow County; William Clancy, Judge. Suit by F. Augustus Heinze and another against the Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Company. From an order denying an application to modify an order directed by the supreme court to. be made, plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bbantly
This cause was heretofore before this court on appeal by the defendant from an order granting an injunction pendente lite. Upon consideration of the facts exhibited in the record, the order of the district court was modified. (26 Mont. 265, 67 Pac. 1134.) Afterward an application was made to the district court to extend the scope of the order so as- to include ore bodies expressly excluded from its operation by the order of this court, it being alleged that subsequent developments made in the disputed territory demonstrated that these ore bodies belong to a vein having its apex in plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Parrot Silver & Copper Co. v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1901
- Heinze v. Boston & Montana Consol. Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by6 opinions
- Silver Surprize, Inc. v. Sunshine Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Consolidated Gold & Sapphire Mining Co. v. StruthersMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- Monidah Trust v. SheehanMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Ringling v. MahurinMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Barker v. CondonMontana Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.