Legal Opinion

Consolidated Gold & Sapphire Mining Co. v. Struthers

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1910No. 2,847PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Deer Lodge County; Geo. B. Winston, Judge. Action by the Consolidated Gold and Sapphire Mining Company against A. D. Struthers and others. From an order granting an injunction pendente lite, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

Upon the filing of the verified complaint, the district court of Deer Lodge county issued an order to show cause why an injunction should not be granted restraining defendants from doing certain things of which complaint was made by plaintiff. The defendants appeared by answer, and a hearing was had, at the conclusion of which the court granted an injunction pendente lite, by the terms of which defendants “are enjoined and restrained from depositing sawdust in the stream flowing through plaintiff’s Ruby First placer claim described in the complaint, or upon the banks thereof, from whence it…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Pope v. AlexanderMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Watkins v. WatkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Royce v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Roosevelt CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Cummins v. CumminsMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Parsons v. MussigbrodMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Monidah Trust v. SheehanMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Ringling v. MahurinMontana Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API