Legal Opinion

Pansy v. Massola

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

While Clara Pansy and her husband George were passengers in an automobile owned and operated by the defendant, an accident ensued, allegedly resulting from the negligence of the defendant. An action was commenced in the City Court of the City of New York, in which Clara and George were plaintiffs, upon the following three causes of action: (1) by Clara, for her personal injuries; (2) by George, for (a) his personal injuries and for (b) his medical expenses, and for (c) loss of earnings resulting from his injuries; and (3) by George for (a) loss of Clara’s services, and for (b) medical…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. SokolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Helman v. MarkoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. Helman v. MarkoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Geller v. TicktinNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Hassid v. KayNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Royaloy, Inc. v. General Moving & Storage, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API