Tate v. Ohio & Mississippi Railroad
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Dearborn Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Stuart, J.—
Tate sued the railroad company for injury to his property by the construction of her road along William street in the city of Lawrenceburgh, on which his lots (describing them) front. The company answered as follows. The first paragraph denies the matters alleged in the complaint. The second and third paragraphs set up the act of incorporation, and a resolution of the city authorities authorizing the construction along William street, &c., and-that in constructing the road no unnecessary injury was done to the plaintiff or the street, sufficient room for the passage of teams being…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hamilton v. New-York & Harlem Rail RoadNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
- Conner v. President of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1819
3Cited by25 opinions
- City of Indianapolis v. KingsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Ross v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Cummins v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.