Piels v. Tron
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGavagan, J.
Motion to tax costs against the unsuccessful plaintiff in favor of the defendant is denied.
Plaintiffs joined in one action under the authority of section 209 of the Civil Practice Act. The trial of the issues before-me resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs Sadie Fine and Joseph Fine and a verdict in favor of the defendant as against the plaintiff William Piels.
There can be but one bill of costs taxed in an action. The successful plaintiffs are of course entitled to costs; therefore, the defendant may not tax costs against the unsuccessful plaintiff Piels. Undoubtedly there is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- M. Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Boldin v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1936
- Girou v. Metropolitan Distributors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leo v. Reile, New York County Courts1959
- Robinson v. Terminal Freight Transport, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958