Allen v. Sarshik
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
Morris A. Sarshik, one of the defendants, by the ownership of at least four-fifths of its capital stock, controlled Morris A. Sarshik, Inc., the other defendant, hereinafter called the corporation. Each of them was in the real estate business, and, at least so far as concerns the transaction hereinafter detailed, the corporation seems to have been nothing more than a cloak behind which Sarshik endeavored to hide. In order to obtain title to an apartment house belonging to plaintiffs, Sarshik induced them to agree to sell it and the fire insurance policies on it,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wright v. BarberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Texas v. HardenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Smith v. Smith, Murphy, & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
- Finney v. CochranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
- Bughman v. Central BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Allen v. PennypackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- In Re Clift's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Helwing v. HeathUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- James Talcott, Inc. v. MargulisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Doyle v. South Pittsburgh Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.