Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 2000No. SCBD-4466Published

1Opinion of the Court

4 P.3d 1242 (2000)

2000 OK 35

STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant,

v.

Michael C. TAYLOR, Respondent.

No. SCBD-4466.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 9, 2000.

Loraine Dillinder Farabow, Assistant General Counsel, Oklahoma Bar Association, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma for complainant.

Michael C. Taylor, pro se, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for respondent.

BAR DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

OPALA, J.

¶ 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API