Legal Opinion
Wray v. Miller
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided January 21, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District. Action by Charles P. Wray against Emil B. Miller. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
The complaint alleges the making of a promissory note by the defendant, payable to the order of one Traynor, its delivery to the latter for value, its presentment for payment at maturity, its dishonor, and its subsequent assignment by Traynor to one Bridel, and by him to the plaintiff. The note is set out at length in the complaint and is in the following form:
“200.00/100. June 30th, 1909.
“Payed when we get it from the Brewery after date I promise to pay to the order of T. Traynor two hundred 00/100 dollars, at 509-511 East 18th St., N. Y. O.
“Value received. E. B. Miller.”
The answer admits…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Deyo v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Rogers v. Polytechnic Institute of BrooklynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kite v. EckleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- In re the Estate of BarkerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936