Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. John Wiesner, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided May 30, 1996No. 09-95-135 CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

This is a summary judgment case. On February 17,1993, Vicki Mitchell, an employee of John Wiesner, Inc., filed a claim with the Industrial Accident Board alleging she suffered an on-the-job-injury on February 15, 1993.1 On March 8, 1993, Mitchell was terminated. Mitchell filed suit pursuant to Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 8307c (Vernon Supp.1989)2 alleging she had been discharged in retaliation for filing a workers’ compensation claim.

Weisner filed a motion for summary judgment raising the after-acquired evidence doctrine and relying upon Jordan v. Johnson Controls, 881…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Malooly Brothers, Inc. v. NapierTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of LaPorte v. BarfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Carnation Co. v. BornerTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Eubanks v. Mullin, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)1995
  5. Azar Nut Co. v. CailleTexas Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Trico Technologies Corp. v. MontielTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Delamora v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  3. Texas La Fiesta Auto Sales, LLC v. Belk, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  4. Saucedo v. Rheem Manufacturing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. Gassmann v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API