Saucedo v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN G. HILL, Justice
(Assigned).
Jose Saucedo appeals from a summary judgment that he take nothing in his claims against Rheem Manufacturing Company and Jaime Loera, the appellees. His cause of action was for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, fraud, defamation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. He contends in a single point of error that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment.
We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part because we hold that the trial court erred in part by granting summary judgment for Rheem with respect to Saueedo’s breach of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- Wornick Co. v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hamilton v. Segue Software Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United Parcel Service Co. v. RickertKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Larson v. Family Violence & Sexual Assault Prevention Center of South Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Gilmartin v. KVTV-CHANNEL 13, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Oliphint v. Richards, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.