Legal Opinion

State v. O'CONNOR

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1969No. File 10599PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of the offense of obtaining money under false pretenses. From judgment of conviction, defendant appeals.

An information was filed which, omitting formal parts, charges "that John O'Connor * * * did * * * obtain from Erickson Oil Company of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, cash of the value of $20.00 * * by falsely pretending and representing to an * * * employee of the said Erickson Oil Company that a check in the sum of $20.00 ¥ * * was a good and genuine check and would be paid on presentation to the bank upon which said check was drawn * * * but said check…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  3. JR Watkins Company v. BeiselSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LohnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. TraversieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. O'CONNOR v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. ChamleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. DowlingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API