Legal Opinion

JR Watkins Company v. Beisel

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1960No. File 9827PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEACAT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, The J. R. Watkins Company, commenced this action against the defendants, Maynard C. Beisel and Roland and Alma Klueber, to recover the sum of $1,364.80 for certain Watkins products sold and delivered to the defendant Beisel, the payment of which plaintiff claims was guaranteed in writing by the defendants, Roland and Alma Klueber.

The defendant Beisel answered and denied liability, and counterclaimed foir damages in the sum of $6,000.

The defendants, Roland and Alma Klueber, filed a separate answer also denying liability on the grounds that the contract…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reeves v. National Fire InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Brown v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Mahoney v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Sully v. EganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Stoecker v. StoeckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Neglect of P.L.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. O'CONNORSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Klein v. KleinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Profit Counselors, Inc. v. KnightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. In Re Trust Estate of HigginsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API