Legal Opinion

Peter v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1899PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Russell, J. Case "by William Peter against the Chicago & West Michigan Railway Company for the alleged negligent burning of lumber. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action is brought to recover the value of a large quantity of lumber belonging to the plaintiff, which was consumed by fire occurring on the 18th of November, 1893, which fire is claimed to have had its origin in sparks emitted from an engine on defendant’s road. The lumber was manufactured for the plaintiff by Horning & Hart, who owned a mill at Keno, a place between three and four miles north of Woodville, a station on the defendant’s Big Rapids branch. The track into Keno was built by defendant at its own cost, except for right of way, and was originally used exclusively for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Perrott v. ShearerMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Fero v. . the Buffalo and State Line Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Hagan v. Chicago, Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. LullMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Cooper v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wood v. VromanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Motts v. Michigan Cab Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Powers v. EllisIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Church v. StoldtMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Union Ice Co. v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API