Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Bright

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 21, 1949No. 4-8760Published

1OpinionGeorge Rose Smith, J.

On rehearing. When this case was first submitted neither the transcript nor the briefs indicated that appellant’s four children were parties to the action in the trial court. With his petition for rehearing appellant tenders a supplemental transcript containing an intervention by these children, which was filed before trial but omitted from the original record, and a nunc pro tunc decree reciting the interveners’ appearance at the trial. We are asked to withdraw our first opinion and render a decision on the merits.

In some instances we may permit an amendment of the transcript on rehearing.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Caudle v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API