Legal Opinion

Michael G. Lutz Lodge No. 5, of the Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 2015No. 42 EAP 2014PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this appeal by allowance, we consider the breadth of the authority of an interest arbitration panel acting pursuant to the Policemen and Firemen Collective Bargaining Act (“Act 111”).1 For the reasons that follow, we find that an interest arbitration panel’s authority is limited to addressing issues *329properly submitted to the panel, or those questions reasonably subsumed within those issues. As we conclude the panel in this matter exceeded its authority by speaking to an issue that was neither bargained over, raised in prior related proceedings before the panel, nor…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Washington Arbitration CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Philadelphia Fire Officers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Grimm, R. v. Grimm, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. FieldsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Clark, C. v. Peugh, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. City of Allentown v. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters Local 302Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API