Legal Opinion
People v. Williamson
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 1982No. Crim. 11883PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
Defendant pled guilty to cultivation of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11358) following a denial of his request for diversion. The denial was based upon the district attorney’s determination that the amount cultivated was not for “personal use,” a condition of eligibility for diversion (Pen. Code, § 1000). Defendant appeals upon a certificate of probable cause (People v. Padfield (1982) 136 Cal.App.3d 218 [185 Cal.Rptr. 903]) claiming the district attorney has ventured into forbidden judicial territory. We agree and reverse the judgment.
Facts
Defendant was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. LealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Sledge v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. PadfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Weber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. GlasperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. CovarrubiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. BrackettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. HudsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.