Legal Opinion

Thorne v. Cosand

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1903No. 20,033PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Erom Booné Circuit Court; B. S. Higgins, Judge. Suit by Irvin E. E. Tborne and others against Erank Cosand and another. Erom a judgment for defendants, ' plaintiffs appeal. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.

Action by appellants to set aside conveyances for nnsoundness of mind of tbe grantor and undue influence. Appellants are sons of Susan Oosand by a former marriage. Appellee Aaron Oosand is the surviving second husband of Susan, and, appellee Erank Cosand is the son of Susan and Aaron. Susan' Oosand, joined by her husband, Aaron (appellee), on February 16, 1900, executed a deed by which she conveyed her real estate in Jamestown to her son Erank (appellee) for love and affection, who, on the same day, by deed, conveyed the same to his father, Aaron. Appellants assault these conveyances,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Teegarden v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Dawson v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. State Ex Rel. Cline v. SchrickerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Young v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. Isenhour v. SPEECE, ADMR.Indiana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State Ex Rel. Reiman v. KimmellIndiana Supreme Court · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API