Legal Opinion
Bridges v. FH McGraw & Company
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided March 29, 1957PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STANLEY, Commissioner.
The circuit court dismissed for want of jurisdiction the complaint of the appellants, Herbert Bridges and Robert C. Newman, against F. H. McGraw and Company, appellee, which sought a declaration of rights and recovery of certain travel pay claimed to be due them and other employees under a bargaining agreement made with their labor union. The judgment rests on the conclusion that jurisdiction lies in the federal court by virtue of § 301 of the National Labor Relations Act, popularly known as the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 185. A similar complaint filed in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Pennsylvania v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers, Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Springer v. Powder Power Tool Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Kilgore v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Margie Reliford, Administratrix of the Estate of Henderson G. Reliford, Deceased v. Eastern Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Strickland v. AMERICAN BAKERY & CONFECTIONERY WORKERS UNION & INDUSTRY NATIONAL WELFARE FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.