Legal Opinion

Gurley v. O'Dwyer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1895PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Barry Circuit-Court.—Hon. J. C. Lamson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

—Tlie plaintiffs sued Van Gieson, Turner and the defendant, before a justice of the peace on a promissory note for $103.70, dated May 21, 1892, *349and bearing interest at the rate of eight per cent, per annum from date. Van Grieson made default and Turner confessed judgment, but the defendant put in a plea of non est factum, and upon a trial thereof before the justice recovered judgment. From this judgment the plaintiffs appealed to the circuit court, where the defendant’s plea . of non est factum was tried anew before a jury. The jury found for the plaintiffs, and returned the following verdict:

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Snyder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. State v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  3. Patterson v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  4. Morrison v. OvertonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  5. Berry v. PuseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hays v. HoganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  2. Jordan v. St. Joseph Railway, Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Stanard v. Sampson Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Hodges v. BayleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Newton v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API