Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Overton

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 14, 1866PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Warren District Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDillon, J.

i. verdict: not signed. The parties agreed that the jury might return a sealed verdict, and the bill of exceptions recites that “ the jury returned a verdict as follows: , yye> july; for the plaintiff the sum of $10.83.’ ”

A motion was made in arrest and for a new trial based upon the ground that the verdict was not signed by the foreman.

The motion was overruled and this is the only error assigned. There was no claim made in the court below that the above was not in fact the verdict of the jury. On the contrary the bill of exceptions states that it was the *466verdict “ returned by tbe jury.” Tbe…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stanard v. Sampson Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Hodges v. BayleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Gillespie v. AshfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Dunlap v. Raywood Rice Canal & Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Gurley v. O'DwyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API