United States v. Missouri
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are the cross motions for summary judgment of Plaintiff United States of America and Defendants State of Missouri, et al. [Docs. 38 and 40]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff United States’ motion for partial summary judgment, Doc. 38, is granted in part, and Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, Doc. 40, is denied.
I. Undisputed Facts
The Missouri National Guard (“Guard”) employs technicians to provide administrative, personnel, maintenance, and other support to the Guard’s soldiers. These employees are referred to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Crews v. City of Mt. VernonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Kelly Butterbaugh, Roseanne T. Faltin, John C. Marderness, Robert J. Bono v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Eric Gross v. PPG Industries, IncoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Welshans v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.