Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Justice's Court

California Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 13659PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

The County of Los Angeles, through its duly authorized county counsel, is here seeking a writ of mandate to compel the respondent Justices’ Courts, located in the county, and the duly elected justices of such courts, to exercise original jurisdiction in certain causes which the respondent courts and justices have refused to entertain.

At the recent session of the legislature section 112 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the state of California and section 1425 of the Penal Code of the state, relating to the jurisdiction of Justices’ Courts, were amended (Stats. 1929, p. 834; Stats. 1929, p.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Puterbaugh v. WadhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People v. Wong WangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. TossettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. In Re MizeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Shipp v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Cty.California Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Commonwealth v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. McAuliffe v. KaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API