Legal Opinion

MacKe v. MacKe

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 17, 1917No. 6 Div. 585PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill here under review was filed in a double aspect. In the first aspect a cancellation of the mortgage is sought by the complainant, on the ground that it was given as security for her husband's debt, and therefore void under the statute. In the second aspect the bill acknowledges the validity of the mortgage, and shows the belief on the part of the complainant that the same had been paid by her husband, and his assurance to her of that fact; but also shows that, in the event it be ascertained that the note had not been paid, complainant is ready and willing to pay whatever sum is found…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dixie Grain Co. v. QuinnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Moore v. Empire Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Kant v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Durr v. Hanover National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Morris v. Fidelity Mortgage Bond Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kelly v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Davis v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Staples v. BarretSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. CannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Self v. SelfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API