Self v. Self
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The bill as amended was for a sale for division of the lands among joint owners. To a decision on demurrer it was necessary to declare the legal effect of the instrument exhibited as a part of the bill — whether it was a will or a deed.
In Henderson v. Henderson, 210 Ala. 73, 92, 97 So. 353, it is declared that, in determining whether an instrument be a deed or a will, the controlling question is: Did the maker intend any estate or interest whatever to vest before his death, and by the execution of the paper? “Or * * * did he intend that all the interest and estate should take effect only…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Sharp v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Graves v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Daniel v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Shannon v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Merrill v. BoalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1926
- Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Hoglan v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Wilcoxen v. OwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Wiggins v. WigginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.