Legal Opinion

Self v. Self

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1925No. 8 Div. 719PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The bill as amended was for a sale for division of the lands among joint owners. To a decision on demurrer it was necessary to declare the legal effect of the instrument exhibited as a part of the bill — whether it was a will or a deed.

In Henderson v. Henderson, 210 Ala. 73, 92, 97 So. 353, it is declared that, in determining whether an instrument be a deed or a will, the controlling question is: Did the maker intend any estate or interest whatever to vest before his death, and by the execution of the paper? “Or * * * did he intend that all the interest and estate should take effect only…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Sharp v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Graves v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Daniel v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  5. Shannon v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Merrill v. BoalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1926
  2. Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Hoglan v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Wilcoxen v. OwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Wiggins v. WigginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API