Legal Opinion

Stallings v. Splain

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 1, 1920No. 534PublishedCited by 142 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis

Stallings was indicted in the District Court of the United States for the District of Wyoming for embezzling monies entrusted to him as United States Commissioner. Being in the District of Columbia, he was arrested there by Splain, marshal for the District, and was detained to await the institution of proceedings for his removal. In making the arrest Splain had relied, not upon a warrant issued by a commissioner for the District, but upon a bench warrant issued to the marshal for the District of Wyoming on the indictment. Stallings filed immediately in the Supreme Court of the District of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Wales v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Kurtz v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Beavers v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States Ex Rel. Bilokumsky v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Mahler v. EbySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Virsnieks v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API