Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Burgin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1985No. 75A84Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Martin

Believing as I do that the “plain error” doctrine has no proper place in the law of evidence, I concur in the result reached in part I of the majority opinion. State v. Black, 308 N.C. 736, 303 S.E. 2d 804 (1983) (Martin, J., concurring). In this regard, it is notable that the Evidence Code, N.C.G.S. 8C, became effective 1 July 1984. It does not contain a reference to the “plain error” doctrine created by the federal courts and adopted by a majority of this Court in Black, but, rather, provides that “an appellate court may review errors affecting substantial rights if it determines, in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. CochranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Ange v. AngeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Ormand Mining Co. v. Gambrill & Melville Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API