United States v. Andreadis

BARTELS, District Judge.

Motion by defendants Arthur D. Herrick and New Drug Institute, Inc. to dismiss the indictment as against them or, in the alternative, to suppress all evidence <or leads therefrom upon the grounds that ■(1) they were deprived of effective assistance of counsel because of the United States Attorney’s unlawful intrusion into the counsels of the defense, and (2) the Government’s use of the record of a ■“Hearing Before Report of Criminal Violation” was a deprivation of their right to counsel, to a fair trial and against self-incrimination.

Defendants, with others, are…