Legal Opinion

Isaacson v. Dorius

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1983No. 18166PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

From a judgment holding the defendant Clair Dorius solely responsible for damages resulting from an automobile collision near Fayette, Utah, he appeals to this Court, contending it was error to take the case from the jury as a matter of law.

We need not discuss in any detail the facts that form the basis for the appeal, since the appeal in this case was untimely, as evidenced by the following. The judgment was filed in the Register of Actions on September 8, 1981, followed by a timely motion for a new trial filed by defendant on September 16, 1981. The hearing on the motion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Disconnection of Certain Territory From Highland CityUtah Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maverik Country Stores, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  2. GeoMetWatch Corp. v. Utah State Univ. Research Found.Utah Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Silva v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. Fields v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  5. State v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API