Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Petty

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1989No. 88-899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioner argues that the trial court erred to reversal in failing to inform him of the provisions of the Youthful Offender Act in a timely manner. We disagree. However, we do address this issue for the purpose of clarifying the court's duty in this regard.

Code 1975, § 15-19-1, sets forth the court's duties with respect to application of the Youthful Offender Act, as follows:

"(a) A person charged with a crime which was committed [before the person reached the age of 21 years] but was not disposed of in juvenile court and which involves moral turpitude or is subject to a sentence of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Clemmons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Raines v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. Baldwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. Charles Coleman, Cross-Appellee v. State of Alabama, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  2. Gordon v. NagleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Lochli v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  4. Pardue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Pardue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API