Desoto Cab Co. v. Picker
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge •
Plaintiff Desoto Cab Company, Inc., d/b/a Flywheel Taxi (“Flywheel”), has filed a suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against the Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”), in their official capacities only. Flywheel, a “traditional” taxi company, asserts a § 1983 equal protection claim against the CPUC based on its assertion of jurisdiction over new transportation carriers such as Uber, Lyft, and Sidecar. Flywheel contends that these so-called transportation network…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Public Util. Comm'n of Ohio v. United Fuel Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Overton v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Force MOS Technology Co., Ltd. v. LinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Rebecca Flores v. California Public Utilities Commission, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026