Legal Opinion
Force MOS Technology Co., Ltd. v. Lin
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 19, 2024No. 5:22-cv-08938Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FORCE MOS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Case No. 22-cv-08938-SVK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DECLINING TO JOIN NON- 9 v. PARTIES UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 19 10 BO-IN LIN, Re: Dkt. No. 75 11 Defendant. 12 This action stems from Defendant-attorney Bo-In Lin’s alleged failure to maintain Plaintiff 13 Force MOS Technology Co., Ltd.’s patents. Because of this failure, the patents expired, rendering 14 them unenforceable. Plaintiff did not discover the patents’ expiration until after certain third 15 parties allegedly infringed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of Colusa Indian Community v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Ofelia Bakia and Mihai Bakia, as the Parents of Santiago Bakia, Per ca.c.c.p. § 376 v. County of Los Angeles of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. BhatiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Serbin v. Ziebart International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.