Legal Opinion

Bruce v. City of Spartanburg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 30, 1938No. 14711PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Stabler.

The plaintiff in this action seeks to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her as the result of negligence on the part of the defendant in the maintenance of one of its streets. The answer of the city was a denial of the material allegations of the complaint. At the proper stage of the trial of the case, November 3, 1937, the defendant moved for a directed verdict. The mo tion was refused, and the jury found for the plaintiff $1,-500.00. A new trial was also denied, and this appeal followed.

Co…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stone v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  2. Caston v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  3. Terrell v. City of OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  4. Correll v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  5. Berry v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abernathy v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. Floyd v. Town of Lake CitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Campbell v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  4. Hammett v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API