Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Dodds
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided May 4, 2016No. Appellate Case No. 2014-001833; No. 5403PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
In this medical malpractice case, Virginia and Todd Marshall (the Marshalls) appeal the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Dr. Kenneth A. Dodds; Charleston Nephrology Associates, LLC; Dr. Georgia Roane; and Rheu-matology Associates, P.A. (collectively “Respondents”). The Marshalls argue the court erred in holding the statute of repose for a medical malpractice action begins to run after a medical professional’s first alleged misdiagnosis. We reverse and remand.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In February 2010, Virginia was diagnosed with Walden-strom’s macroglobulinemia — or…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- First United Methodist Church of Hyattsville v. United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Town of Summerville v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Sloan v. HardeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Marshall v. DoddsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
- Johnson v. RobertsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
- Heaton v. StirlingDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
- Heaton v. StirlingDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.