Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Dodds

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 27, 2019No. Appellate Case 2016-001936; Opinion 27873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE HEARN :

**455 Virginia Marshall and her husband filed a medical malpractice claim against Dr. Kenneth Dodds (a nephrologist), Dr. Georgia Roane (a rheumatologist), and their respective practices, alleging negligent misdiagnosis against both Dodds and Roane. The circuit court granted Dodds' and Roane's motions for summary judgment, ruling these actions were barred by **456 the statute of repose. The Marshalls appealed, and the court of appeals reversed and remanded the cases for trial. Marshall v. Dodds , 417 S.C. 196 , 789 S.E.2d 88 (Ct. App. 2016). We affirm as modified, holding the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Bolick v. American Barmag Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Hill v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Forshey v. JacksonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Kaminer v. CanasSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johns v. University of South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
  2. Poly-Med, Inc. v. Novus Scientific Pte. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  3. Poly-Med, Inc. v. Novus Scientific Pte. Ltd., Novus Scientific, Inc. Novus Scientific ABSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API