Legal Opinion
Consolidated Indemnity & Ins. v. Salmon & Cowin, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 22, 1933No. 6770PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Circuit Judge.
The firm of Sutton Bros, obtained a contract to do certain road work in Tennessee, and gave the statutory bond required with appellant, the Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance Company, a New York corporation, as surety. Appellee, Salmon & Cowin, Inc., an Alabama corporation, obtained a subcontract to do part of the work. Appellees brought suit against the surety alone to recover a balance due for labor and material furnished in completing its subcontract. Judgment was entered on a verdict of the jury in the amount of $14,387.66. This appeal followed. It is unnecessary to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Hutchinson v. Chase & Gilbert, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Koenigsberger v. Richmond Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Anderson v. Morris & E. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Oakland Sugar Mill Co. v. Fred W. Wolf Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roark v. American Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938