Legal Opinion
Stahl v. Smud
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 22, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMikoll, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ingraham, J.), entered October 7, 1993 in Otsego County, which denied a motion by defendant Jorge D. Smud for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him.
Defendant Jorge D. Smud (hereinafter defendant), a physician specializing in obstetrics and gynecology, delivered the child of plaintiff Blair M. Stahl (hereinafter plaintiff) on June 23, 1986. During the delivery, plaintiff sustained a fourth-degree perineal laceration. In July 1989, plaintiff was diagnosed as having a recto-vaginal fistula. She commenced this action along with her…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Nykorchuck v. HenriquesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Richardson v. OrentreichNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gomez v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Easton v. KellermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Boyle v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Lemmerman v. Delmar DentalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004