United States v. Fialkowski
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COSTELLO, Judge:
Appellant was convicted by a military jury, contrary to his pleas, of unlawful entry, attempted larceny and larceny in violation of Articles 130, 80 and 121, 10 U.S.C. §§ 930, 880 and 921, respectively. All offenses were committed on post, against military victims. The approved sentence is set out above.
During trial the military judge considered a psychiatric report offered by appellant in which he noticed a remark that appellant was under civilian criminal charges when he enlisted. Thereupon, the judge ordered counsel for both sides to obtain evidence on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. Francisco ToscaninoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Thomas C. Smith, Appellant-Petitioner v. Stanley S. Resor, Secretary of the Army, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. RoweUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. DiGiulioU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. EwingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. SylvaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978