Legal Opinion

Silva v. Pickard

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1896No. 692PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Third district court, Territory of Utah. Hon. S. A. Merritt, Judge. Action by Y. M. C. Silva against W. L. Pickard and H. Cohn & Co. for a partnership accounting. From the judgment, Silva and Pickard appeal. No briefs were filed in this case.

1Opinion of the Court

Ritchie, District Judge:

This suit is for a settlement of partnership accounts. In 1883, the plaintiff, as one partner, the defendant W. L. Pickard, as another, and the defendant H. Cohn & Co., as a third partner, constituted for a year the Territorial Wool Association. There was a renewal of that partnership afterwards, until and including 1887. The concern was so organized and continued for the business of buying wool in Utah, and selling it in Boston. Each year it *247toad a contract witto the Massachusetts Loan & Trust Company. By their contract entered into in 1887, the Boston company were to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Himely v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  3. Washington Bridge Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Leese v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Klauber v. San Diego Street Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City Electric, Gas & Power Co. v. BaumhoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Morrow v. MatthewIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Potter v. Ajax Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Helper State Bank v. CrusUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Hill v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API