Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 14, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2005-1276PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are two motions for protective orders filed by defendants in response to discovery requests made by plaintiff Harry Barko. The first motion was jointly filed by defendants Halliburton Company, Kellogg Brown and Root, Inc., Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., KBR Technical Services Inc., Kellogg Brown & Root Engineering Corporation, Kellogg Brown & Root International, Inc. (a Delaware Corporation), and Kellogg Brown & Root International, Inc. (a Panamanian Corporation) (collectively, the “KBR defendants”). A separate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Robert C. McFarlane v. Esquire MagazineCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- In re Honda American Motor Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Allen v. Russian FederationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- National Community Reinvestment Coalition v. Novastar Financial, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cabell v. Zorro Productions, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
- Rundquist v. Vapiano AgDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. de C.V.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Pruco Life Insurance Company v. California Energy Development, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021