Legal Opinion
Rundquist v. Vapiano Ag
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2009-2207PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiff Ewa-Marie Rundquist’s motion to compel the appearance of six people for depositions in the District of Columbia, and to extend the period for jurisdictional discovery for sixty days. The six noticed deponents are: Kent Hahne, Klaus Rader, Matteo Thun, Martin Luible, Claus Sauer, and Gregor Gerlaeh. The plaintiff contends that these individuals are officers, directors, or managing agents of defendants Vapiano SE, Vapiano International, and Va-piano Franchise USA. For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. William H. Webster, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- In re Outsidewall Tire LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- In re Honda American Motor Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- National Community Reinvestment Coalition v. Novastar Financial, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Calderon v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2012
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. de C.V.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Capana Swiss Advisors AG v. Rymark Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2025
- Daniel & Max LLC v. BAB Holding Company, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
- Grain D'or LLC v. WizmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.